If Thou Be'st Born To Strange Sights

you know you were.

Reflections on Australia Day, Australian culture, and Aboriginal rights

Alternate Title: What the hell were we smoking when we thought of January 26th?

Expect a long one, kids.

Australia Day was two days ago, and I was going to write a post for it. But then life crept up on me, I ended up not writing said post, and now I feel a little bit differently about it anyway.

Let me start from the beginning.

My original feelings were that I couldn’t celebrate Australia Day, for a few reasons. I still feel the same way about these reasons, but I’m not so sure that my anti-celebration stance still holds. I’ll get to that though. First of all, I’ll go through the reasons.

Most of Australia sees the 26th of January as the date for the celebration of the establishment of a society we love and wouldn’t trade for the world. I believe in celebrating that. I just think that the 26th is the wrong day to choose for said celebration.

So the first of January? I’ll go with that. Australia became, well, Australia, its own country, on 1 January 1901. Federation Day marked the beginning of a new year and a new nation with its own purpose and a vision and all that jazz. I mean, it was still quite similar to Britain in a lot of those respects, but fundamentally, it was the day of formal acknowledgement that we were beginning to move away from Britain and have our own set of national identities. It’s a celebration of a positive event of building up. No matter that some people thought that others were completely messed up for proposing Federation–the date as a whole still marks something constructive: a birth.

But the 26th of January is the anniversary of no such thing. I can’t say it’s an anniversary of death with a straight face, but it’s pretty close.

Years ago, Captain James Cook claimed this land as a commodity on behalf of Britain, denying the pre-existing Aboriginal right to the land they were already on. We didn’t even acknowledge their humanity, instead classifying them under the National Flora and Fauna Act until something crazy like 1956.

Basically, white people just swanned in, said, “That looks good. Let’s use it to house the dregs of our society”, swanned out, and swanned right back in with a bunch of the dregs of their society. On the 26th of January, 1788, the first batch of dregs landed. It’s the day Australia began to work as a useful commodity for Britain, not a country.

It kind of all began to go downhill from there. It marked the beginning of the British hunting Aboriginal people for sport, treating them like dirt, and banning them from ‘civilised’ areas. America wasn’t the only country with Jim Crow laws: we had a whole stack of them.

To sum up, the whole connection with 26th January is way more fraught with tension than January 1st. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not saying that Federation is the opposite of the 26th, and that it was the day Aboriginal people were given rights and everybody was happy and had their own pet fluffy duckling. If we’re going to look at it objectively, January 26th is the anniversary of the start of exploitation and mass-scale colonisation of an invaded land, and January 1st is the anniversary of the creation of a new nation founded on said exploitation and colonisation 110 years later.

While there are a multitude of things wrong with this, I can’t help but see the second date as being comparatively so much more positive (we’re leaving objective territory now. Feel free to disagree with me).

The main reason I feel this way is that the society we’ve got right now is much better than the society we were a hundred and twelve years ago. We’ve got a long way to go, but the fact remains that we have come pretty damn far. We wouldn’t be where we are today without Australia becoming its own country, and I think it’s right to celebrate the major milestone of the development of our own cultual identity. We can’t say just when the very beginning was, but we can point to the first of January 1901 and say, “This is when it was set in stone.”

And if you’re looking to celebrate the day your nation was born, it might be a good idea to actually celebrate it closer to the day it was born. I know it’s all stuffed up because 1 Jan is New Year’s Day too, but, I mean, just give us an extra day after it. It’s like those years when Christmas falls on a Saturday, so we get Boxing Day on Sunday, and Boxing Day Holiday on Monday. Just have Federation Day Holiday on January 2nd or something. If the reason we got January 26th was because it was the closest day that wasn’t a holiday to Federation–I have to say, I think it was still kind of a dumb choice.

***

Making a rather important tangent before we can go any further, can we say that the beginning of the development of our cultural identity was, in fact, the date the First Fleet landed? Am I constructing an argument against the 26th of January out of nothing?

This is where it all gets rather grey.

Yes, you can make a case for that. You definitely can. You can say that the landing of the First Fleet meant that our population count suddenly leapt into existence (though you’d be forgetting Aboriginal people, and according to everyone they were around before the 1700s). You can say that the instant the convicts landed on Australian (well, British, at that time) soil, they had to adapt to a new way of life in a new country. They had to make a go of it. They had to pull their heads in, get rough-and-ready, and just deal with it–all typically Australian values. Well, okay, maybe not the pulling your head in part.

The first groups and classes who made their way onto Australian soil, too, helped to define the new attitudes of this country. Of course the middle class and the upper class came over later on, when business (i.e. gold and sheep) was booming, but the very first major influx of attitudes were the lower class in England with a smattering of Irish political prisoners. They were used to hard knocks, to being treated unfairly. They were fairly anti-establisment, and small wonder: you could get transported to Australia for stealing half a loaf of bread. They used to hang kids for stealing hankies. Not really the hardened criminal past we like to pretend we have, is it?

Fact remains, though, you can tell that although the majority of Australians can’t complain about oppression, we still carry the stamp of that in our cultural attitudes. The little Aussie battler is practically trademarked, even though the most we normally battle against these days is rising taxes and the most daring thing we do is drink and drive, or, if we’re going to get really wild, egg Julia Gillard. These attitudes, and more, have been passed down through society from a time when bushrangers were romantic figures, and it was settlers vs squatters (the squatters won. It’s Australia).

I balance that against the way Britain controlled everything. The way the national identity was only just in the very vague stages of being formed. The fact that Australia wasn’t by itself, but a collection of divided colonies overseen and completely controlled by Britain.

On 26th January 1788, the defining presence was that of exploitation and invasion rather than the vague beginnings of a national identity. When they got off that boat, those people were cowed and sore and sick and injured and slow and bruised and traumatised. The jailers and the officers, all British to the core, ruled the roost. At that stage, the convicts and prisoners were merely bringing over their own class identity to cope with the situation they’d been forced into. They adjusted it here and there, I’m sure, but the main thing is that these people had no concept of being a nation unto themselves. They were British, through and through. (Except for the Irish prisoners.) As for the Aboriginal people, they were a culture separate of their own–and they do play a role in our culture and national identity now.

Summary: the beginnings of the hallmarks of our national identity as we know it were definitely there, but the concept of themselves as a separate nation definitelywasn’t. For me, that’s the dealbreaker, since to have a national identity, you kind of need a nation to go with it. But you might say it differently.

This really is a matter of opinion. I can’t stand here and say that it’s definitively wrong to use January 26th as Australia Day (though looking back, I seem to have done my best). I’m weighing everything up and making my own judgements, and it’s a bit like weighing up chalky cheese and cheesy chalk. They’re not completely different, they do relate to each other–but they’re not that similar either.

De-tangent-ing now.

***

To get back to talking about society being better than before and therefore we should celebrate it: we also need to examine ‘better’ from the point of view of Aboriginal people.

Obviously, Aboriginal people still face marginalisation and discrimination from like everyone else in the country. In turn, there are a number of Aboriginal groups who harbour a lot of bitterness and resentment, and for good reason. We’re still a fairly divided society (though since I live in the state with the highest Aboriginal population, it may just be that this is what I see). We still have many, many problems to deal with, and on a day-to-day basis, it still looks like the same old thing: casual racism dropped throughout conversations in a horrifyingly similar manner to that in which pre-Civil War American Southerners would have spoken of their slaves. But we’re moving forward. Witness ‘Sorry Day’, when we finally did the right thing and apologised on behalf of our ancestors for kidnapping Aboriginal children in the 30s and creating the Silent Generation. Witness the slow growth of Aboriginal programs and the growing number of Aboriginal people in professional capacities.

To be brutal about it, the other side of the coin is that even if we white people don’t belong here, it is, plain and simple, just not practical to chuck every single white person out of the country so that the Aboriginal people can have their land back. Very few of them would want it that way, either. There are still groups of tribal Aboriginal people, but despite their problems with white attitudes, most Aboriginal people do prefer the beneficial side of the type of society we brought with us. In all honesty, and I’m not trying to be racist here, I’m simply stating facts: we provide most of their jobs, and our taxes pay most of their welfare. Again, I’m not trying to be racist. Aboriginal people make up 1 percent of the population: 200 000 of 20 million. It’s simple maths.

History marches on. The invasion has happened. What’s done is done–now that we’ve made the mess we’ve made, we’ve got to do our best to build something on top of what we’ve got left. We can’t always go on about  rights and justice when the simple fact is that life is messy. I can’t take back the fact that the society I love, that I live in, has a murky and clouded past. I can’t help being born here and loving this country, the land itself, right down to my bones. And I know there are people who will disagree fiercely with me about this, but I’ll say it anyway: in sentiment, Australia isn’t just Aboriginal land anymore. There are people here who are born and bred in this country, who will fight for it to the death, and they’re as white as white can be. I’m one of them. Aboriginal people have a solid claim to their history here. They have the right to be recognised as the traditional owners of the land, and indeed they should be. But nobody can deny that there is a culture, a national identity, and a whole new history intertwined with the story of this land. We weren’t there when Australia was invaded. We’re here now, and we have a claim here, too.

And that’s why I think that January 26th should be, if anything, more like ANZAC Day – a sobering day to reflect on the life we have here, the complicated history of bitterness and olive branches we have, and at what cost to its own people, of all races, that this nation came about. January the 26th should not play host to a light-hearted celebration that overshadows what really happened centuries ago, and gets people thinking deeply about their love of this nation–something that this date doesn’t really represent.

Unfortunately, Aboriginal rights weren’t a going concern in the first decade of the twentieth century. And since that was when January 26th began to be celebrated… well, let’s just say nobody was thinking about any of this back then. It’s highly unlikely that the date will be changed. I think it should be, but I don’t think it will happen.

To add a final anecdote: By law I have to be paid for a public holiday. Because I couldn’t go to work (and I would rather have), I wanted to do something for the community instead. So I got up at five in the morning and helped out with a free Rotary Club community Australia Day breakfast. An odd choice, considering how strongly I felt about this, but the only actual choice around. And besides, I’m not going to say people can’t celebrate their nation on a day they genuinely believe is for celebrating it, and even though I was facilitating it, I was also helping to ensure that people who didn’t get a good feed all the time actually got one that day. That’s a good cause.

At the time I thought that my pay for taking Australia Day off would be equivalent to blood money, but what I saw at that breakfast kind of changed my mind. There was a range of people from all races: African, Asian, Caucasian, and yes, plenty of Aboriginal people. All were celebrating Australian heritage as they saw it. At one point I looked up to see an Aboriginal woman giving a speech about her own national identity–publicly celebrating Australia Day. Since I wasn’t able to pay much attention to what was going on up the front (I know there was a banjo involved somewhere), I don’t know whether she was the token Aboriginal person for the event–but I do know that she wouldn’t have been up there if she personally hadn’t wanted to be. That’s not how we do things.

So we have racial tension to deal with. It is the elephant in the room for a lot of us. It is publically acknowledged with exquisite discomfort and shame at every possible function that might need it mentioned to be on the safe side. It is referenced subtly in any Aboriginal speech given to a room full of whitefellas. But I saw no protests yesterday. I saw no outrage. There would, of course, have been some somewhere, but that breakfast wasn’t feeling any effects. I saw a group of people all celebrating something they loved. The issues surrounding the date might have mattered to them, but they didn’t matter enough to visibly mar their own celebration and general enjoyment of the day. And the fact remains that the protesters over January 26th are in a definite minority. We can’t treat this as a massive social outrage, when, though it is an issue that needs to be sorted out, it isn’t a massive social outrage.

So I suppose I’m undecided as to whether or not I should make a definite decision not to celebrate Australia Day next time, and where the line is on celebration. I will still, however, help with some sort of community event, same time next year.

***

If you’re reading this, it’s statistically unlikely that you even come from the Southern Hemisphere, let alone from Australia. If you are, what do you think about Australia Day? If you’re Aboriginal, what do you think? Are you offended by anything I’ve said?

If you’re not Australian, what do you think about your country’s equivalent holiday/s? What about your own country’s murky past, and the racial tensions that people sometimes pretend don’t exist? I’d really like to know about more than my own little corner of the world.

Please keep from being offensive. Passionate declarations are allowed as long as they’re not intended to be overly inflammatory (a little bit of inflammatory I suppose is unavoidable). While I won’t delete or block you for differing in opinion with me, this is my blog and I’d like to keep it nice.

Advertisement

Single Post Navigation

13 thoughts on “Reflections on Australia Day, Australian culture, and Aboriginal rights

  1. Hey, really interesting post. I think I have been thinking several of these points too (summed up in my blog post from yesterday if you might like to read). Mainly I think that you can’t change history and we should use Australia Day to focus on the future of Australia now. As someone who just moved here from England two years ago (and I didn’t really know about Australia Day before that) I think it’s sad that the world has only heard about the protests and Gillard’s shoe and Abbott’s comments, rather than all the good stuff Aussies do on the public holiday. Good on you for volunteering on Australia Day too.

  2. Michael on said:

    Very nice essay, coherent and thorough. Definitely made me think. As a caucasian Australian, I have very deep roots in my family. We’ve been Australian for generations, and I happen to have a great respect for the culture and philosophy of native Aboriginal Australians. I agree that quite often the patriotic fanfare can get a little silly and overwhelm the historical facts of the date’s significance, but it’s also important to remember that Jan 26 also marks hundreds of thousands (millions?) of migrants being granted citizenship through the years. This year, 2012, Jan 26 saw approximately 13,700 new Australian citizens. That has to count for something.

    • Stephanie Russo on said:

      Hey, T.

      Thanks for the compliment on the coherency. I try :D

      I do have to disagree with you on that date meaning something just because marks new citizenships, though. The only reason it does is because it’s the date for Australia Day, and I guess I’ve already gone over why I don’t think it’s an appropriate date. However, to those people granted citizenships, it is of course a very special day. Won’t argue with that.

  3. Inkblot on said:

    Passionate declaration: Australia is awesome. The only country I can think of where they could name something so meaningful “Sorry Day” and sincerely mean every word of it.

    I’m an American, so I don’t really know whether anything I can contribute is helpful. I like your reasoning out of the real meaning of the 26th, but I don’t necessarily see how that leads into not wanting to celebrate it.

    Only because obviously, the rest of your country doesn’t view the 26th as “Remember the time we squashed those native guys? Day”.

    Really, as you seem to be aware, it’s ultimately up to you. Just .02 for the devil.

    The only equivalent in my country would be July 4th, but it’s not really the same. I’m sure people did bad things in America on that day before 1776 when the Declaration was ratified, but no one remembers them now. And the nice thing about a nebulous concept like “freedom” is that you can expand it to include whoever pops along. This might just be me, but to an ignorant white guy from America it seems that your process of understanding your diversity started a little later than ours. I think the point when July 4th would have been really, really awkward was probably in the ’60s, early ’70s.

    • Stephanie Russo on said:

      … Thank you. I think. I’m sort of laughing at that.

      “I don’t necessarily see how that leads into not wanting to celebrate it.
      Only because obviously, the rest of your country doesn’t view the 26th as “Remember the time we squashed those native guys? Day”.”

      Well, there is a bit of media hype around it every few years, and a few protests have happened about it, though they never got off the ground. I’ve heard people use names like ‘Invasion Day’ and Wikipedia says another common one is ‘Survival Day’. So there’s that.

      “And the nice thing about a nebulous concept like “freedom” is that you can expand it to include whoever pops along.”

      Ah, America. Discussing this sort of thing makes me realise just how different our cultural values actually are, even though we speak the same language. You guys are all about freedom and rights, and we’re about battling odds and shoving it in the face of authority. Still, insult America OR Australia, and we’re not so different in our reactions :)

      “This might just be me, but to an ignorant white guy from America it seems that your process of understanding your diversity started a little later than ours. I think the point when July 4th would have been really, really awkward was probably in the ’60s, early ’70s.”

      Hee. Chronologically, yes, but comparatively no, since Australia was only colonised around the same time you guys were separating your already well-established colonies from the colonisers. I think that’s what you meant, anyway.

      • Yeah, I’m kind of poking fun at you while admiring you for something my country wouldn’t even understand. :D

        Well, that’s just because we’re all entitled first-world pansies now. Back in the day, there was a lot more expression of such niceties as “the Feds can shove it”. More recently, though, it seems the spirit of anarchy that animated our forefathers is coming to the surface again. If only we remember how to moderate it with their sense of justice and tradition, then we’ll be on a roll.

        I’m pretty sure that’s what I meant. So for me this is interesting to read because it’s a time window into what America looked like in the ’70s-early ’80s.

        At any rate, it’s a deeper discussion than I’m able to make it right now. :D

  4. “If you’re not Australian, what do you think about your country’s equivalent holiday/s? What about your own country’s murky past, and the racial tensions that people sometimes pretend don’t exist? I’d really like to know about more than my own little corner of the world.”

    Well to me the 4th of July (besides being really fun) is the celebration of freedom and the beginning of something wonderful and it’s also a celebration of beating the odds (By all rights one of the most powerful Empires in the world should have crushed my ancestors) and it’s a salute to and reminder of what our ancestors fought and died for.

    As for the whole racial thing. . .

    Yeah, it was a pretty bad deal (and women’s rights, while a hell of a lot better than some places) weren’t to great either.

    But the fact is that that’s changed, it’s over and done with, it’s not my fault and all those people are dead. I doubt they care anymore.

    And let us not forget that it wasn’t just eeeevuulll white people, the cherokee owned slaves and plenty of the indian tribes (Native American takes too long to type) had been gleefully murdering and mutilating each other (not to mention the women were treated like dogs) before the eeeevuulll white people ever came along.

    • Stephanie Russo on said:

      “all those people are dead.”

      Precisely. I would assume most people in America are no longer affected since it was so long ago, but there are still people living here who are part of the Silent Generation, and they’ve got kids and grandkids, too, who have knowledge straight from the horse’s mouth. Makes for a terribly awkward, guilty and bitter background to this sort of thing. No matter what you say, it’s loaded. It’s not to say every white person was bad back then–I live near an old mission site, where in the 30s they’d take in the kids, give them a higher quality of life, and would still make sure they could still see their families frequently–thus saving them from being taken across the state or something, where they’d never see their families ever again. But for a lot of Aboriginal people, it wasn’t like that.

      “And let us not forget that it wasn’t just eeeevuulll white people, the cherokee owned slaves and plenty of the indian tribes (Native American takes too long to type) had been gleefully murdering and mutilating each other (not to mention the women were treated like dogs) before the eeeevuulll white people ever came along.”

      Really? I had no idea. Only the ‘noble savage’ stereotype gets filtered through over here, and while we know that’s got to be a very crude and inaccurate representation, we don’t exactly know what to replace it with.

  5. I love so much what you’ve written here. It’s opened my eyes to a lot of Australia’s history and it resonates with my own American past. Not so much the British relations, but the Native American versus the invading/settling Europeans.

    This sums it up perfectly in my perspective: I can’t take back the fact that the society I love, that I live in, has a murky and clouded past. I can’t help being born here and loving this country, the land itself, right down to my bones. And I know there are people who will disagree fiercely with me about this, but I’ll say it anyway: in sentiment, Australia isn’t just Aboriginal land anymore. There are people here who are born and bred in this country, who will fight for it to the death, and they’re as white as white can be. I’m one of them.

    It irks me that so often, one is now judged for being Caucasian, especially in the school curriculum. I was reading a discussion board from my friend’s college and the ignorant bashing of European settlers at the founding of our country is disturbing. Yes, there was wrong, there were inexcusable crimes committed, but not everyone who first came to America wanted to plunder the Indians and take their land. A good portion were families, looking for a better life for themselves and their loved ones. The fact of the matter is that the people who were complaining on that discussion board were living off the fruits of those early settler’s labours. How about instead of raging over the bad done in the past we all look at the good and bad on both sides, learning from history so we’re not doomed to repeat it? Because you’re right. The fact of the matter is we’re here now, and we’re not our ancestors with their swords of oppression. We can’t help what our forefathers did. But we can live as kind and decent human beings today.

    And there’s absolutely nothing wrong in feeling pride over the patriotic acts of our early American heroes. They bled for this country, not being they wanted to subdue the natives, but because they believed in a better world than the one they’d come from and they were willing to stand up and do something about it.

    The saddest thing for me is that our own government is taking away the same freedoms we fought England for in the 1700′s. And most of us are content to sit and let it happen. Go figure. Sometimes a tiny part of me wonders if staying under England’s rule would have served us better than being duped by lying, stealing congress and a president who wants to control everything with government-run health care, education and business.

    I digress. But this is a fine post and I’m glad you shared.

    • Stephanie Russo on said:

      Thanks, Bethie! I’m glad you learnt something.

      “Yes, there was wrong, there were inexcusable crimes committed, but not everyone who first came to America wanted to plunder the Indians and take their land. A good portion were families, looking for a better life for themselves and their loved ones.”

      This makes me feel like I missed mentioning that this was the same deal for us, that people did get along–though I don’t know where it would belong in my post. Now I feel a little bit more biased :(

      “And there’s absolutely nothing wrong in feeling pride over the patriotic acts of our early American heroes. They bled for this country, not being they wanted to subdue the natives, but because they believed in a better world than the one they’d come from and they were willing to stand up and do something about it. ”

      I’ll quote some of your own stuff back at you, since that was a lovely way to put it.

      “The saddest thing for me is that our own government is taking away the same freedoms we fought England for in the 1700′s. ”

      Really? What sort of freedoms are you talking about here?

      “Sometimes a tiny part of me wonders if staying under England’s rule would have served us better than being duped by lying, stealing congress and a president who wants to control everything with government-run health care, education and business.”

      Well, you might all have turned out to be chavs with thick accents and diseased stumps of legs. But that’s worst-case scenario. ;)

      • If I had to guess, I’d say that she was thinking of freedoms of religion, speech, and the right to self-government. Not many Americans can say exactly what’s wrong with our country these days, but we can all tell it’s not what it was supposed to be.

      • No, I don’t think it was missing from your post. I felt it was implied. I just got carried away with my own thoughts and probably could have been clearer about where I drew distinctions and where I found similarities.

        animusatramenti is right. There are a lot of fundamental rights our founding fathers considered God-given when they took up arms against a tyrannical figure that are now being threatened. In a lot of ways our own self appointed leader is failing us by giving more and more say to government and less to the people who are most affected by it. There are a lot of issues, but I’d say the right to self-government is definitely a big one. Most of it starts right there. The government wants to coddle the American people and be the sole distributor of wealth, health, and education. “This is what’s good for you” the big man says, and then force feeds us whatever he sees fit in each area. We now live in a society where thieving companies and the jobless get bailouts and handouts instead of the American people being relied upon to do the right thing in providing for their fellow man and being a productive member of society. It’s the same with schools. You learn what the standardized goverment-run facility wants you to learn, (except the lucky handfuls of us who were homeschooled) and then you spend thousands of dollars on furthering that education for the right to wave a piece of paper saying you’re smart enough to get promoted. Then when you’ve amassed a fortune through hard work, in comes the good ‘ole government again to say you make too much money which isn’t fair to all the poor people so you have to pay higher taxes. (I have friends who refused a pay increase because they’d be making LESS money due to taxes.) There’s so much about the system that’s messed up. I keep bunny-trailing because every issue opens a new can of worms. I apologize.

        Hah! That’s true! I’m doing that dwelling-on-the-past thing we decided wasn’t healthy. ;)

        To end, I’d like to quote one of my favorite films: The Patriot. Character Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson) says in a scene that strikes me every time, “Would you tell me please, Mr. Howard, why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away? An elected legislature can trample a man’s rights as easily as a king can.” I have a bad feeling we’ve done just that. Twelve years after that movie was released, that line still resonates.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.